:: AUDIOVALVE IMPRESSIONS RKV Mark III ::
post here your comments with luminare on your headphones ...
by Volker R. from Hamburg, Germany on 02/03/2015 07:22
Dear Mr. Becker,
I am glad to send you today my testimonial for the Audio Valve RKV Mark III headphone amp and Verto impedancer driving my two headphones Stax SR-007 and Abyss AB-1266. Since I am very happy with your products it is a pleasure for me to deliver you details of my experience
Before I start I want to state that my testimonial reflects what I hear and what I like, it is subjective. Other high end enthusiasts may rate it differently. My ability to compare to other products was rather limited since I have heard only a limited amount of products in direct comparison.
Testimonial Audio Valve RKV Mark III headphone amp and Audio Valve Verto driving Abyss AB-1266 and Stax SR-007 MK2
Behind the purchase of expensive high end equipment there is often a long individual high end track record. So what leads to the fact that I am a satisfied owner of Audio Valve RKV Mark III and Verto?
I am a loyal long term customer of Stax. I love these headphones with their silky, smooth presentation and resolution. I ended up years ago with a Stax SR-007 MK2 together with the tube amp SRM-007t. Years of wonderful listening experience made the STAX combination one of the best investments I ever made in high end. The tube amp is my favorite of all STAX headphone amps primarily because of the sonic qualities in reproducing classical music. I love classical music. But also pop and jazz, so at the end I like it all!
In the last years my focus towards headphones increased because of two positive drivers: my young daughter (unfortunately not sharing my loudspeaker passion) and all these new headphones and headphone amps entering the market and getting highest recommendations from the audio press.
Reading all these enthusiastic reviews I was afraid I could miss something hearing only to my good old Stax. So I tried an Audeze LCD-2 one year ago. A very good headphone with great look and feel. But at the end I had to recognize that after the attractiveness of being new and exciting was gone I did again prefer the Stax for most of my listening - regardless of the type of music. Only in the case of heavy rock or pop with extensive low frequency energy I used the Audeze. With the Audeze I did not hear the high frequency resolution of the STAX that is so important to me, I missed the delicate characteristics which makes the STAX so special, taking care of every musical detail.
Someday having a lot of time during holiday being spend with reading hifi magazines I detected a strange looking new high end model called Abyss AB-1266. I read some reviews about it and decided to buy it from Hifi-Studio am Falkensee (Uwe Heile). What a great ground breaking experience! It confirmed a old rule: after 7 seconds you know whether you like it or don't like it, whether something new and special is happening. As well as the Stax the Abyss offers me a similar level of smoothness and liquid sonic. But the Abyss AB-1266 combines it with greater dynamics, incredible bass performance and a tangible and grounded sound. It is so good that you can't stop listening to your jazz, pop and rock recordings. You hear it like never before. For me a huge milestone in headphone development.
So what about my final preference between Stax SR-007 and Abyss. I definitely like both. They play on the same level. I prefer the Abyss for listening to Jazz, Pop and Rock. For classical music I still tend to prefer the Stax at the end. Delicate sound making strings and vocals sound so warm and natural, showing all subtle nuances of tone without harshness. I rate the advantage of the Abyss in playing pop and rock higher than the slight advantage of the SR-007 in the field of classical music. So in total I see a very slight advantage for the Abyss. The best headphone of the world I heard so far (so far I had not heard the Stax SR-009).
So let’s come to the amplification part. Today there are so many choices, every month new headphone amps announced - good times for headphone audiophiles! But if you want the best and the also the ideal match for your specific headphone (s) the amount of choices can be quickly reduced.
I only heard a very small portion of the available choices. So I am not able to give ratings like "best headphone amp in the world". And to reduce the scope of my comparison even further - I heard these amps only with three headphones: Stax SR-007, Audeze LCD-2 and Abyss AB-1266. An assessment of a headphone amp could be and sometimes definitely will end differently depending on the headphone you drive.
I heard the Violectric V200, Fosgate Signature, Bryston BHA-1, the headphone amp of my Accuphase C-2400 preamp and the Audio Valve RKV Mark III. My absolute favorite is unfortunately the most expensive of these: the Audio Valve RKV Mark III. Smooth and very dynamic. A powerhouse is also strong in subtle details. The Abyss is so lively with the Audio Valve. It seems that the Abyss need some freedom to play, may be you know that kind of passion by a symphony orchestra being directed by a great conductor encouraging them to play without too much control - they will play being inspired. The Audio Valve has that kind of smooth characteristics that I like - without harshness. It seems to me not being a deviation to neutrality and power. Pop and Rock are sounding great. Incredible bass performance - tight and deep. And very delicate reproduction of tone colors.
In addition to the sonic merits I love the RKV III because I can see inside the amplifier. I can imagine where the music finds the way through the circuit - without being harmed. The glow of the eight tubes is wonderful. Audio Valve and Abyss are both not looking reduced like purist "Bauhaus" style. After some weeks in my home I now think they represent a "good and characterful looking couple".
I also like the company behind Audio Valve. Mr. Becker has been long in the business, his company can offer a tradition, he is passionate, knows the basics of electronic engineering. He is one of that technical oriented small size company owner that keeps the economy going! He is very responsive to me. I can talk directly to him. If you prefer to talk to a smart sales guy representing your high end company of choice look elsewhere ;-)
The Violectric V 200 is not so dynamic, it sounds also very smooth, very controlled, a little be controlled in comparison to the Audio Valve, with less bass power in comparison to Audio Valve RKV Mark III. But also very very good. Considering the lower price of the Violectric V 200 it is an outstanding product. For me the Violectric was too good to sell it after buying the Audio Valve, the RKV Mark III was to good not to buy it after already owning the Violectric. The advantage of the RKV III is so significant that I wanted to have the RKV III despite of the significant higher price tag. During summer I still prefer to listen with "cold" transistor components without tubes. So my Violectric knows that he is still needed, also for short listening, I prefer to switch on tube equipment only when knowing that I want to listen at least for an hour.
I prefer the Violectric in comparison to the Bryston. The Bryston sounds neutral, but for me a little bit too cold. The Fosgate Signature is just not powerful enough to drive Audeze and Abyss properly, I recommend it only for less demanding headphone. With my Sennheiser HD 650 it sounds good, it has a very charming look.
After buying the RKV III Mr. Becker told me about the Verto, a module which can be connected to RKV Mark II and III to drive my STAX. Initially I tried a prototype, in the meantime I bought the final product. Why? Because of the sonic quality. Verto is not a beauty in comparison to RKV Mark III. I assume no own will buy it to invite neighbors to have a look to this expensive high end gear. When you look to the photographs on the Audio Valve web page please consider that the latest version offers a labeling of the front and back plane, making the Verto looking more attractive and also as a good match to the RKV Mark III. But still you purely want it because it sounds damn good and a little bit different than Stax 007t: seems to be a little bit more neutral, clear and dynamic without losing totally that silkiness of the 007t. Offers slightly stronger bass performance. So listening to pop and rock the SR-007 has now slightly more punch I sometime miss when using the Stax 007t. So for pop and rock my favorite is the Verto, for classical music sometimes I prefer the 007t with that warmth, for other recordings the more neutral Verto.
So I urgently recommend listen to these products. I am glad that I contacted Mr. Becker a year ago. Listening via Audio Valve RKV III and Verto and Stax and Abyss are the best listening experiences I can imagine.
Unfortunately I can’t answer all obvious questions. How do Audio Valve Mark RKV III / Verto compete against other flagship products, e.g. these from the states, Woo Audio, Cavalli or Blue Hawaii? I don't care - at least at the moment. My search is over. So I don’t have the desire to change my set up. I am living in Germany, so far I have not found an opportunity to hear these products (in direct comparison). Buying directly from USA comes with some hurdles: high prices because of customs and strong dollar, the risk that I don’t like them without option to send back, the risk that it gets complicated if they arrive with bugs / damages (caused by transport). My experience with selling US second hand high end audio products without a strong domestic brand rsp. distributor shows me that you will have to give huge discounts in the case you want resell it. Too many hurdles for me - again, I am very happy with the Audio Valve,
In addition to my sonic experience I want to share also my practical experience in day to day operation.
I use the RKV III now since one year. It worked all the time trouble free without an
Edited on: 02/03/2015 07:57 by Administrator